AI InterviewSearch…Search problems, topics, or pages…Ctrl KGet started
Mediumdata sufficiency

~90s

Data sufficiency: Ravi's age from his older brother's

Question: What is Ravi's age?

Statement I: Ravi is 8 years younger than his brother. Statement II: Ravi's brother will be 30 in five years.

Which statements are needed?

Show the answer and the worked solution

Correct answer: C.

Both together are needed

Worked solution

  1. I alone: a relation but no number — not sufficient.
  2. II alone: the brother is 25 now, but nothing links that to Ravi — not sufficient.
  3. Together: brother 25, so Ravi is 17. Both together are needed.

Answer: Both together are needed.

The idea

Evaluate each statement in isolation first, carrying nothing across. The question asks about sufficiency, not the value itself.

Shortcut. Spot what each statement lacks: I has no number and II never mentions Ravi. Each supplies the other's missing piece (brother 25, so Ravi 17), so both are needed.

Common trap. "II alone is sufficient" — II gives a firm number (the brother is 25 now), and the hurried reader silently borrows 'Ravi is 8 years younger' from I.

Data sufficiency: Ravi's age from his older brother's

Data sufficiency: Ravi's age from his older brother's: Question: What is Ravi's age? Statement I: Ravi is 8 years… Answer and worked solution on CodeKairo.

Question

Question: What is Ravi's age?

Statement I: Ravi is 8 years younger than his brother. Statement II: Ravi's brother will be 30 in five years.

Which statements are needed?

Options

  1. I alone is sufficient
  2. II alone is sufficient
  3. Both together are needed
  4. Even both together are not sufficient
Show the answer and the worked solution

Correct answer: C. Both together are needed

Worked solution

  1. I alone: a relation but no number — not sufficient.
  2. II alone: the brother is 25 now, but nothing links that to Ravi — not sufficient.
  3. Together: brother 25, so Ravi is 17. Both together are needed.

Answer: Both together are needed.

The idea

Evaluate each statement in isolation first, carrying nothing across. The question asks about sufficiency, not the value itself.

Shortcut. Spot what each statement lacks: I has no number and II never mentions Ravi. Each supplies the other's missing piece (brother 25, so Ravi 17), so both are needed.

Common trap. "II alone is sufficient" — II gives a firm number (the brother is 25 now), and the hurried reader silently borrows 'Ravi is 8 years younger' from I.

All Mathematical Reasoning questions · placement mock tests