AI InterviewSearch…Search problems, topics, or pages…Ctrl KGet started
Mediumsome/all

~75s

Engineers and graduates

Statements:

  1. All engineers are graduates.
  2. Some graduates are unemployed.

Conclusions: I. Some engineers are unemployed. II. Some unemployed people are graduates.

Which conclusion follows?

Show the answer and the worked solution

Correct answer: B.

Only II

Worked solution

  1. The unemployed graduates may all lie outside the engineers, so I does not follow.
  2. 'Some graduates are unemployed' reverses to 'some unemployed people are graduates': II follows.

Answer: Only II.

The idea

'Some' statements reverse freely; 'all' statements never do. Checking whether a conclusion is just a premise restated is the quickest test.

Shortcut. The middle term 'graduates' is never covered in full (predicate of an 'all', subject of a 'some'), so no engineer–unemployed link follows; II is statement 2 simply converted.

Common trap. "Both" — reasoning that engineers are graduates and some graduates are unemployed, so some engineers must be; the unemployed graduates can all be non-engineers.

Engineers and graduates — Syllogisms Aptitude Question

Engineers and graduates: Statements: All engineers are graduates. Some graduates are unemployed. Conclusions: I. Answer and worked solution on CodeKairo.

Question

Statements:

  1. All engineers are graduates.
  2. Some graduates are unemployed.

Conclusions: I. Some engineers are unemployed. II. Some unemployed people are graduates.

Which conclusion follows?

Options

  1. Only I
  2. Only II
  3. Both
  4. Neither
Show the answer and the worked solution

Correct answer: B. Only II

Worked solution

  1. The unemployed graduates may all lie outside the engineers, so I does not follow.
  2. 'Some graduates are unemployed' reverses to 'some unemployed people are graduates': II follows.

Answer: Only II.

The idea

'Some' statements reverse freely; 'all' statements never do. Checking whether a conclusion is just a premise restated is the quickest test.

Shortcut. The middle term 'graduates' is never covered in full (predicate of an 'all', subject of a 'some'), so no engineer–unemployed link follows; II is statement 2 simply converted.

Common trap. "Both" — reasoning that engineers are graduates and some graduates are unemployed, so some engineers must be; the unemployed graduates can all be non-engineers.

All Syllogisms questions · placement mock tests