AI InterviewSearch…Search problems, topics, or pages…Ctrl KGet started
Easyvenn

~45s

All cats are animals

Statements:

  1. All cats are animals.
  2. All animals are living things.

Conclusions: I. All cats are living things. II. All living things are cats.

Which conclusion follows?

Show the answer and the worked solution

Correct answer: A.

Only I

Worked solution

  1. Cats ⊂ animals ⊂ living things, so every cat is a living thing: conclusion I follows.
  2. The reverse does not: living things include much more than cats. Conclusion II does not follow.

Answer: Only I.

The idea

Venn diagrams settle syllogisms. 'All A are B' draws A inside B; conclusions must hold for every valid drawing, not just the obvious one.

Shortcut. Chain the 'all' statements forward: cats → animals → living things gives I; II runs the chain backwards, and 'all A are B' never turns into 'all B are A'.

Common trap. "Both I and II" — reversing the 'all' statements; plenty of living things (trees, dogs) are not cats.

Syllogisms

1 of 30

Level

Easy

Target time

~45s

PreviousNext

All cats are animals — Syllogisms Aptitude Question

All cats are animals: Statements: All cats are animals. All animals are living things. Conclusions: I. Answer and worked solution on CodeKairo.

Question

Statements:

  1. All cats are animals.
  2. All animals are living things.

Conclusions: I. All cats are living things. II. All living things are cats.

Which conclusion follows?

Options

  1. Only I
  2. Only II
  3. Both I and II
  4. Neither
Show the answer and the worked solution

Correct answer: A. Only I

Worked solution

  1. Cats ⊂ animals ⊂ living things, so every cat is a living thing: conclusion I follows.
  2. The reverse does not: living things include much more than cats. Conclusion II does not follow.

Answer: Only I.

The idea

Venn diagrams settle syllogisms. 'All A are B' draws A inside B; conclusions must hold for every valid drawing, not just the obvious one.

Shortcut. Chain the 'all' statements forward: cats → animals → living things gives I; II runs the chain backwards, and 'all A are B' never turns into 'all B are A'.

Common trap. "Both I and II" — reversing the 'all' statements; plenty of living things (trees, dogs) are not cats.

All Syllogisms questions · placement mock tests