AI InterviewSearch…Search problems, topics, or pages…Ctrl KGet started
Mediumvenn

~75s

All dogs are animals

Statements:

  1. All dogs are animals.
  2. All animals are living beings.

Conclusions: I. All dogs are living beings. II. Some living beings are dogs.

Which conclusion follows?

Show the answer and the worked solution

Correct answer: C.

Both I and II

Worked solution

  1. Dogs ⊂ animals ⊂ living beings, so every dog is a living being: I follows.
  2. Since dogs exist and all are living beings, some living beings are dogs: II also follows.
  3. Both conclusions hold.

Answer: Both I and II.

The idea

An 'all A are B' statement also supports 'some B are A', because the class A is taken to be non-empty. That converse is valid and often overlooked.

Shortcut. Two linked 'all' premises give 'All dogs are living beings' (I), and that conclusion converts to 'some living beings are dogs' (II).

Common trap. "Only I" — rejecting II as a reversed 'all' statement; the limited 'some' converse is valid because dogs exist.

All dogs are animals — Syllogisms Aptitude Question

All dogs are animals: Statements: All dogs are animals. All animals are living beings. Conclusions: I. Answer and worked solution on CodeKairo.

Question

Statements:

  1. All dogs are animals.
  2. All animals are living beings.

Conclusions: I. All dogs are living beings. II. Some living beings are dogs.

Which conclusion follows?

Options

  1. Only I
  2. Only II
  3. Both I and II
  4. Neither
Show the answer and the worked solution

Correct answer: C. Both I and II

Worked solution

  1. Dogs ⊂ animals ⊂ living beings, so every dog is a living being: I follows.
  2. Since dogs exist and all are living beings, some living beings are dogs: II also follows.
  3. Both conclusions hold.

Answer: Both I and II.

The idea

An 'all A are B' statement also supports 'some B are A', because the class A is taken to be non-empty. That converse is valid and often overlooked.

Shortcut. Two linked 'all' premises give 'All dogs are living beings' (I), and that conclusion converts to 'some living beings are dogs' (II).

Common trap. "Only I" — rejecting II as a reversed 'all' statement; the limited 'some' converse is valid because dogs exist.

All Syllogisms questions · placement mock tests