AI InterviewSearch…Search problems, topics, or pages…Ctrl KGet started
Hardnegative

~90s

No student is lazy

Statements:

  1. No student is lazy.
  2. Some lazy people are rich.

Conclusions: I. Some rich people are not students. II. No rich person is a student.

Which conclusion follows?

Show the answer and the worked solution

Correct answer: A.

Only I

Worked solution

  1. Some lazy people are rich; no lazy person is a student; so those rich people are not students. Conclusion I follows.
  2. Other rich people (not lazy) could be students, so conclusion II is too strong.

Answer: Only I.

The idea

'Some' conclusions are safer than 'no' or 'all'. Ask whether a single counter-drawing can break the conclusion; if yes, it does not follow.

Shortcut. 'Some lazy are rich' plus 'no lazy is a student' gives the standard 'some rich are not students'; a 'no' conclusion needs both premises universal.

Common trap. "Both" — stretching 'some rich people are not students' to 'no rich person is a student'; rich people who are not lazy may still be students.

No student is lazy — Syllogisms Aptitude Question

No student is lazy: Statements: No student is lazy. Some lazy people are rich. Conclusions: I. Answer and worked solution on CodeKairo.

Question

Statements:

  1. No student is lazy.
  2. Some lazy people are rich.

Conclusions: I. Some rich people are not students. II. No rich person is a student.

Which conclusion follows?

Options

  1. Only I
  2. Only II
  3. Both
  4. Neither
Show the answer and the worked solution

Correct answer: A. Only I

Worked solution

  1. Some lazy people are rich; no lazy person is a student; so those rich people are not students. Conclusion I follows.
  2. Other rich people (not lazy) could be students, so conclusion II is too strong.

Answer: Only I.

The idea

'Some' conclusions are safer than 'no' or 'all'. Ask whether a single counter-drawing can break the conclusion; if yes, it does not follow.

Shortcut. 'Some lazy are rich' plus 'no lazy is a student' gives the standard 'some rich are not students'; a 'no' conclusion needs both premises universal.

Common trap. "Both" — stretching 'some rich people are not students' to 'no rich person is a student'; rich people who are not lazy may still be students.

All Syllogisms questions · placement mock tests